KNOWLEDGE CENTER
Click on the Subject Matter bullet links below to access our Knowledge Library of Patents, Trademarks and Designs. This information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to be used as legal advice.
VIDEO RESOURCES
Patent Videos
Trademark Videos
ARTICLES
Bill C-31 as it relates to the Trademarks Act
The Good... The Bad... and The Ugly The Good... While there are several good amendments made by the Bill to the Trademarks Act, one significant positive change is the broader definition given to a trademark. The amended definition of a trademark is for a sign or combination of signs which include a...
The Patent Bargain…Canada
In the Supreme Court decision of Teva Canada Ltd. v. Pfizer Canada Inc. 2012 SCC 60 – Nov 8, 2012 - (Decision varied by SCC in 2013 from pronouncement that patent is not valid to “Teva has established its allegation that Canadian Patent 2,163,446 is not valid) the validity issue...
Supreme Court Canada – TradeMarks – Geographical Use
One of the issues considered in the Canadian Supreme Court's decision on Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc., 2011 SCC 27, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 387 related to the non-overlapping geographical uses of the trade-marks in dispute. Both Masterpiece Inc. (Masterpiece) and Alavida Lifestyles Inc. (Alavida) were operators of retirement residences in...
Canadian Patent Litigation Costs
Costs play an important role for business when making decisions to file and prosecute patent applications through to the grant of patents. These costs can run into the 10’s of thousands of dollars for protection in one or more countries. But the cost of obtaining protection sometimes pales in comparison...
Canadian Patent Agent Exams 2012
The Canadian Patent Agent Exams are very challenging to pass in one or more sittings. The Exams are written once a year, usually in April and comprise four, four hour exams, written in four consecutive days. The first paper requires evaluation of an invention, prior art and the drafting of...
Ray’s Favorite Inventor
The First Inventor to Receive a Patent? Filippo Brunelleschi - 1377-1446 - trained as a goldsmith in Florence, is principally known for his eventual work as a structural engineer and architect. At the end of the 13th century a decision was made by the governing body of Florence to construct a...
Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Flexibility in Section 45 Non‑Use Proceedings
Decision: Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne & Institut National De L’origine Et De La Qualité v. Coors Brewing Company, 2026 FCA 2 (Jan. 9, 2026) Court: Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) Overview On January 9, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) ruled that section 45 of the Trademarks Act does not impose a fixed rule requiring a trademark owner to justify...
Trademark Confusion in Healthcare: Why Patients Matter in the Analysis
Introduction When it comes to trademark disputes in the pharmaceutical industry, the question of who counts as the relevant consumer can make or break a case. A recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Novartis AG (2025 FCA 212) sheds light on this issue....
Bad Faith Trademark Filings: Lessons from the Tress Wellness Case
When you build a brand, protecting it with a trademark is essential. But what happens when someone else registers your brand name before you do? A recent Federal Court decision in FXSWEDE AB v. Gengbin Xu (2025 FC 1864) sheds light on this issue. The case highlights how Canadian law...
Common Design and Patent Infringement: Lessons from Adeia v Videotron
In a noteable decision released on November 14, 2025, the Federal Court of Canada addressed and applied for the first time in a decision the doctrine of common design in the context of patent infringement. The case, Adeia Guides Inc. v Videotron Ltd., 2025 FC 1725, offers valuable insights for...
When an Inventor Represents Himself in Court: Justice Whyte Nowak’s Decision in Dusome v Canada
In a recent Federal Court ruling, Barry Dusome and Wyatt Dusome v Attorney General of Canada, Justice Allyson Whyte Nowak set aside a decision by the Commissioner of Patents that had rejected a long-pending patent application for a new poker-style card game. The case is notable not just for its...
Double Patenting in Canada: What Inventors Should Know from the NCS v. Kobold Case
Understanding Double Patenting and Divisional Patents If you're an inventor, entrepreneur, or business owner filing patents in Canada, you may have heard of double patenting. Double patenting is legal rule that prevents you from getting more than one patent for the same invention. This rule is especially important when filing divisional...
What Inventors Can Learn About Patent Claim Construction from the NCS v. Kobold Case
Understanding how patent claims are interpreted can make or break your intellectual property rights. A recent decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in NCS Multistage Inc. v. Kobold Corporation (2025 FCA 187) offers valuable lessons for inventors and businesses looking to protect their innovations through patents. In this post, we’ll...
Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Strict “Due Care” Standard for Patent Reinstatement
On September 5, 2025, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled in Canada (Attorney General) v. Matco Tools Corporation, 2025 FCA 156, reaffirming a strict “due care” standard for reinstating abandoned Canadian patents. This decision overturns a more flexible test from the Federal Court and highlights the high level of care...
CIPO Trademark Amendments Now in Force
Amendments to Canada’s Trademarks Act and Regulations took effect April 1, 2025. These changes are part of the Government of Canada’s Intellectual Property Strategy. They give the Registrar of Trademarks new powers and improve trademark procedures. Main Changes at a Glance Here are the key updates that took effect today: New authority...