ARTICLES

Explore articles covering Patents, Trademarks, and Designs, including news, insights, and practical information. All content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Human hand shaking a digital blue hand, representing a balanced and responsible approach to artificial intelligence.

How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World

Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...

Two hands exchanging a beige folder labeled 'Trademark Portfolio' beneath a banner that reads 'IP Decisions'

Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Flexibility in Section 45 Non‑Use Proceedings

Decision: Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne & Institut National De L’origine Et De La Qualité v. Coors Brewing Company, 2026 FCA 2 (Jan. 9, 2026) Court: Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) Overview On January 9, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) ruled that section 45 of the Trademarks Act does not impose a fixed rule requiring a trademark owner to justify...

Poker cards and casino chips on a table, with the words “IP Decisions” displayed above.

When an Inventor Represents Himself in Court: Justice Whyte Nowak’s Decision in Dusome v Canada

In a recent Federal Court ruling, Barry Dusome and Wyatt Dusome v Attorney General of Canada, Justice Allyson Whyte Nowak set aside a decision by the Commissioner of Patents that had rejected a long-pending patent application for a new poker-style card game. The case is notable not just for its...

Magnifying glass highlighting patent claims text under the heading ‘Patents Update’.

Double Patenting in Canada: What Inventors Should Know from the NCS v. Kobold Case

Understanding Double Patenting and Divisional Patents If you're an inventor, entrepreneur, or business owner filing patents in Canada, you may have heard of double patenting. Double patenting is legal rule that prevents you from getting more than one patent for the same invention. This rule is especially important when filing divisional...

Silhouettes of workers on scaffolding at a construction site during sunset under the heading ‘Patents Update’.

What Inventors Can Learn About Patent Claim Construction from the NCS v. Kobold Case

Understanding how patent claims are interpreted can make or break your intellectual property rights. A recent decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in NCS Multistage Inc. v. Kobold Corporation (2025 FCA 187) offers valuable lessons for inventors and businesses looking to protect their innovations through patents. In this post, we’ll...

Patentability vs Validity

Patentability vs. Validity: What’s the Difference in Canadian Patent Law?

When is an invention truly protected—and when can that protection be challenged? These questions lie at the heart of Canadian patent law, and a recent Ontario Superior Court decision, Zacon Limited v. Provincial Doors Inc., 2025 ONSC2954 offers a clear and practical answer.  In this post, we’ll explore the difference between patentability...

Human hand shaking a digital blue hand, representing a balanced and responsible approach to artificial intelligence.

How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World

Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...

Patentability vs Validity

Patentability vs. Validity: What’s the Difference in Canadian Patent Law?

When is an invention truly protected—and when can that protection be challenged? These questions lie at the heart of Canadian patent law, and a recent Ontario Superior Court decision, Zacon Limited v. Provincial Doors Inc., 2025 ONSC2954 offers a clear and practical answer.  In this post, we’ll explore the difference between patentability...

Lightbox sign reading “I need more time” used to illustrate patent term extension

Canada’s New Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) Framework: What You Need to Know

Starting January 1, 2025, Canada will implement a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) system. This change compensates for unreasonable delays in patent issuance, fulfilling obligations under the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). PTA extends the standard 20-year patent term, ensuring inventors can fully benefit from their patents. Who Is Eligible for PTA? To qualify,...

Knowledge Center: Should You Do a Patent Search?

Should You Do a Patent Search Before Filing? Pros, Cons, and When It Makes Sense

What Is a Patent Search? A patent search means looking for existing patents that might affect your invention. This includes: Patents and applications in official databases (like the U.S. Patent Office or European Patent Office) Two Common Types of Searches Novelty Search (Patentability Search): Checks if your invention is new and non‑obvious—two key requirements for getting a...

Knowledge Center

Pros and Cons For Filing a US Provisional Patent Application

Pros for filing US provisional patent application: Low cost: Provisional patent applications are generally less expensive to prepare and file than non-provisional patent applications. Quicker filing: If time is a factor to file a patent application, Provisional patent applications can be filed faster than non-provisional patent applications, as they require...

Knowledge Center: Virtual Agent

What is a Virtual In-House Corporate Patent or Trademark Agent?

A business corporation may not have the resources to hire in-house one or more corporate patent or trademark agents to meet their patent needs, but may still require the cost effective value that an in-house patent/trademark agent brings to a business' strategic plan.  In such instances a virtual in-house corporate...

Patent documents on a desk showing one application branching into multiple related filings, illustrating divisional patent applications.

UNITY OF INVENTION AND DIVISIONAL APPLICATIONS IN CANADA

In the United States, a patent application may be filed based on an earlier filed “parent” application.  Such applications include divisional applications and continuation applications.  Continuation application and divisional applications have the same specification as the parent application but normally have different claims.  Continuation-in-part (CIP) applications are also available in...

Human hand shaking a digital blue hand, representing a balanced and responsible approach to artificial intelligence.

How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World

Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...

Knowledge Center: Strong vs Weak Trademarks

What Makes a Trademark Strong? A Practical Guide for Canadian Entrepreneurs

If you're building a brand in Canada, choosing the right trademark is one of the most important decisions you’ll make. A strong trademark doesn’t just help customers remember you—it protects your business legally and gives you the exclusive rights to grow with confidence. In this guide, we’ll walk you through five...

Knowledge Center: Virtual Agent

What is a Virtual In-House Corporate Patent or Trademark Agent?

A business corporation may not have the resources to hire in-house one or more corporate patent or trademark agents to meet their patent needs, but may still require the cost effective value that an in-house patent/trademark agent brings to a business' strategic plan.  In such instances a virtual in-house corporate...

Map of Canada with location pins, representing geographical use of trademarks across Canada.

Supreme Court Canada – TradeMarks – Geographical Use

One of the issues considered in the Canadian Supreme Court's decision on Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc., 2011 SCC 27, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 387  related to the non-overlapping geographical uses of the trade-marks in dispute. Both Masterpiece Inc. (Masterpiece) and Alavida Lifestyles Inc. (Alavida)  were operators of retirement residences in...

Human hand shaking a digital blue hand, representing a balanced and responsible approach to artificial intelligence.

How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World

Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...

Knowledge Center: Virtual Agent

What is a Virtual In-House Corporate Patent or Trademark Agent?

A business corporation may not have the resources to hire in-house one or more corporate patent or trademark agents to meet their patent needs, but may still require the cost effective value that an in-house patent/trademark agent brings to a business' strategic plan.  In such instances a virtual in-house corporate...

Two hands exchanging a beige folder labeled 'Trademark Portfolio' beneath a banner that reads 'IP Decisions'

Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Flexibility in Section 45 Non‑Use Proceedings

Decision: Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne & Institut National De L’origine Et De La Qualité v. Coors Brewing Company, 2026 FCA 2 (Jan. 9, 2026) Court: Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) Overview On January 9, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) ruled that section 45 of the Trademarks Act does not impose a fixed rule requiring a trademark owner to justify...

Poker cards and casino chips on a table, with the words “IP Decisions” displayed above.

When an Inventor Represents Himself in Court: Justice Whyte Nowak’s Decision in Dusome v Canada

In a recent Federal Court ruling, Barry Dusome and Wyatt Dusome v Attorney General of Canada, Justice Allyson Whyte Nowak set aside a decision by the Commissioner of Patents that had rejected a long-pending patent application for a new poker-style card game. The case is notable not just for its...

Magnifying glass highlighting patent claims text under the heading ‘Patents Update’.

Double Patenting in Canada: What Inventors Should Know from the NCS v. Kobold Case

Understanding Double Patenting and Divisional Patents If you're an inventor, entrepreneur, or business owner filing patents in Canada, you may have heard of double patenting. Double patenting is legal rule that prevents you from getting more than one patent for the same invention. This rule is especially important when filing divisional...

Silhouettes of workers on scaffolding at a construction site during sunset under the heading ‘Patents Update’.

What Inventors Can Learn About Patent Claim Construction from the NCS v. Kobold Case

Understanding how patent claims are interpreted can make or break your intellectual property rights. A recent decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in NCS Multistage Inc. v. Kobold Corporation (2025 FCA 187) offers valuable lessons for inventors and businesses looking to protect their innovations through patents. In this post, we’ll...

Patent Update: Due Care

Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Strict “Due Care” Standard for Patent Reinstatement

On September 5, 2025, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled in Canada (Attorney General) v. Matco Tools Corporation, 2025 FCA 156, reaffirming a strict “due care” standard for reinstating abandoned Canadian patents. This decision overturns a more flexible test from the Federal Court and highlights the high level of care...

Trademarks Update

CIPO Trademark Amendments Now in Force

Amendments to Canada’s Trademarks Act and Regulations took effect April 1, 2025. These changes are part of the Government of Canada’s Intellectual Property Strategy. They give the Registrar of Trademarks new powers and improve trademark procedures. Main Changes at a Glance Here are the key updates that took effect today: New authority...

Visit our Videos page for short clips covering key patent and trademark topics and processes.