ARTICLES
Explore articles covering Patents, Trademarks, and Designs, including news, insights, and practical information. Use the topic tabs below to explore each area of intellectual property. All content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Budget 2026 Patent Changes: What Canadian Inventors and Businesses Need to Know
On November 5, 2026, the Government of Canada tabled its federal budget. It proposes several changes that affect patents. Some will change how patent ownership is recorded. Others aim to protect businesses from unfair patent threats, and one could help companies pay for patent protection. In this post, we explain the...
IP Decisions Digest Canada – 2026-11-02
Prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by Craig Wilson and Company before publication.* Decisions released October 16 to October 31, 2026. In this edition, we summarize one decision. The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the expungement of two SEA TOW trademark registrations, confirming when a registered mark is “adopted” for the...
IP Decisions Digest Canada – 2026-10-15
AI Report* Prepared for Craig Wilson and Company - 2026-10-15 Prepared with AI assistance — see disclaimer below. Federal Court Decisions Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Wang Citation: 2026 FC 1244 Court: Federal Court Decision date: 2026-10-08 (heard over five days, June and July 2026) Court file number: T-1887-17 Judge: McHaffie J. ...
Are Methods of Medical Treatment Patentable in Canada? What Pharmascience v. Janssen (2026 SCC 26) Means for Dosing Regimen Patents
Key takeaways In Pharmascience Inc. v. Janssen Inc., 2026 SCC 26 (July 17, 2026), the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously upheld Janssen’s Canadian Patent No. 2,655,335, which claims a dosing regimen for paliperidone palmitate (INVEGA SUSTENNA), an injectable antipsychotic given monthly to people with schizophrenia. Seven of the nine judges...
How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World
Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...
Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Flexibility in Section 45 Non‑Use Proceedings
Decision: Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne & Institut National De L’origine Et De La Qualité v. Coors Brewing Company, 2026 FCA 2 (Jan. 9, 2026) Court: Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) Overview On January 9, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) ruled that section 45 of the Trademarks Act does not impose a fixed rule requiring a trademark owner to justify...
Trademark Confusion in Healthcare: Why Patients Matter in the Analysis
Introduction When it comes to trademark disputes in the pharmaceutical industry, the question of who counts as the relevant consumer can make or break a case. A recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Novartis AG (2025 FCA 212) sheds light on this issue....
Bad Faith Trademark Filings: Lessons from the Tress Wellness Case
When you build a brand, protecting it with a trademark is essential. But what happens when someone else registers your brand name before you do? A recent Federal Court decision in FXSWEDE AB v. Gengbin Xu (2025 FC 1864) sheds light on this issue. The case highlights how Canadian law...
Common Design and Patent Infringement: Lessons from Adeia v Videotron
In a noteable decision released on November 14, 2025, the Federal Court of Canada addressed and applied for the first time in a decision the doctrine of common design in the context of patent infringement. The case, Adeia Guides Inc. v Videotron Ltd., 2025 FC 1725, offers valuable insights for...
Are Methods of Medical Treatment Patentable in Canada? What Pharmascience v. Janssen (2026 SCC 26) Means for Dosing Regimen Patents
Key takeaways In Pharmascience Inc. v. Janssen Inc., 2026 SCC 26 (July 17, 2026), the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously upheld Janssen’s Canadian Patent No. 2,655,335, which claims a dosing regimen for paliperidone palmitate (INVEGA SUSTENNA), an injectable antipsychotic given monthly to people with schizophrenia. Seven of the nine judges...
How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World
Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...
Patentability vs. Validity: What’s the Difference in Canadian Patent Law?
When is an invention truly protected—and when can that protection be challenged? These questions lie at the heart of Canadian patent law, and a recent Ontario Superior Court decision, Zacon Limited v. Provincial Doors Inc., 2025 ONSC2954 offers a clear and practical answer. In this post, we’ll explore the difference between patentability...
Divisional Patent Applications in Canada: What Inventors Need to Know
If you're filing a patent application in Canada and your invention includes more than one innovative idea, you may need to split your application. This is where divisional patent applications come in. In this guide, we explain what divisionals are, why they matter, and how to use them wisely—especially under...
Canada’s New Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) Framework: What You Need to Know
Starting January 1, 2025, Canada will implement a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) system. This change compensates for unreasonable delays in patent issuance, fulfilling obligations under the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). PTA extends the standard 20-year patent term, ensuring inventors can fully benefit from their patents. Who Is Eligible for PTA? To qualify,...
Frequently Asked Patent Questions and Answers
The following are frequently asked patent questions and answers. These questions and answers are provided for information purposes only and do not constitute legal patent advice. What is a patent? A patent is a legal monopoly granted by the government to inventors for a certain period of time, in exchange for publicly...
Should You Do a Patent Search Before Filing? Pros, Cons, and When It Makes Sense
What Is a Patent Search? A patent search means looking for existing patents that might affect your invention. This includes: Patents and applications in official databases (like the U.S. Patent Office or European Patent Office) Two Common Types of Searches Novelty Search (Patentability Search): Checks if your invention is new and non‑obvious—two key requirements for getting a...
Pros and Cons For Filing a US Provisional Patent Application
Pros for filing US provisional patent application: Low cost: Provisional patent applications are generally less expensive to prepare and file than non-provisional patent applications. Quicker filing: If time is a factor to file a patent application, Provisional patent applications can be filed faster than non-provisional patent applications, as they require...
What is a Virtual In-House Corporate Patent or Trademark Agent?
A business corporation may not have the resources to hire in-house one or more corporate patent or trademark agents to meet their patent needs, but may still require the cost effective value that an in-house patent/trademark agent brings to a business' strategic plan. In such instances a virtual in-house corporate...
How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World
Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...
What Makes a Trademark Strong? A Practical Guide for Canadian Entrepreneurs
If you're building a brand in Canada, choosing the right trademark is one of the most important decisions you’ll make. A strong trademark doesn’t just help customers remember you—it protects your business legally and gives you the exclusive rights to grow with confidence. In this guide, we’ll walk you through five...
Frequently Asked Trademark Questions & Answers
The following are frequently asked trademark questions and answers. These questions and answers are provided for information purposes only and do not constitute legal trademark advice. What is a trademark? A trademark is a symbol, word, scent, sound or phrase that is used to identify and distinguish the goods or services of...
What is a Virtual In-House Corporate Patent or Trademark Agent?
A business corporation may not have the resources to hire in-house one or more corporate patent or trademark agents to meet their patent needs, but may still require the cost effective value that an in-house patent/trademark agent brings to a business' strategic plan. In such instances a virtual in-house corporate...
Bill C-31 as it relates to the Trademarks Act
The Good... The Bad... and The Ugly The Good... While there are several good amendments made by the Bill to the Trademarks Act, one significant positive change is the broader definition given to a trademark. The amended definition of a trademark is for a sign or combination of signs which include a...
Supreme Court Canada – TradeMarks – Geographical Use
One of the issues considered in the Canadian Supreme Court's decision on Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc., 2011 SCC 27, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 387 related to the non-overlapping geographical uses of the trade-marks in dispute. Both Masterpiece Inc. (Masterpiece) and Alavida Lifestyles Inc. (Alavida) were operators of retirement residences in...
How CWC Intellectual Property Works in an AI-Driven IP World
Introduction Artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, and intellectual property is no exception. From generating patent drafts to summarizing complex legal concepts, AI tools promise speed and efficiency. But here’s the truth: while AI can provide answers, it cannot replace judgment. In a world where technology accelerates information,...
Canadian Industrial Designs Update: Alignment with the Hague System
As of today, November 5, 2018, the changes the Industrial Design Act and Rules have come into force bringing the Industrial Design Act and Rules into alignment with the Hague System. The Hague System enables design patents to be filed and managed in multiple countries via one application. Some key...
What is a Virtual In-House Corporate Patent or Trademark Agent?
A business corporation may not have the resources to hire in-house one or more corporate patent or trademark agents to meet their patent needs, but may still require the cost effective value that an in-house patent/trademark agent brings to a business' strategic plan. In such instances a virtual in-house corporate...
Budget 2026 Patent Changes: What Canadian Inventors and Businesses Need to Know
On November 5, 2026, the Government of Canada tabled its federal budget. It proposes several changes that affect patents. Some will change how patent ownership is recorded. Others aim to protect businesses from unfair patent threats, and one could help companies pay for patent protection. In this post, we explain the...
IP Decisions Digest Canada – 2026-11-02
Prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by Craig Wilson and Company before publication.* Decisions released October 16 to October 31, 2026. In this edition, we summarize one decision. The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the expungement of two SEA TOW trademark registrations, confirming when a registered mark is “adopted” for the...
IP Decisions Digest Canada – 2026-10-15
AI Report* Prepared for Craig Wilson and Company - 2026-10-15 Prepared with AI assistance — see disclaimer below. Federal Court Decisions Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Wang Citation: 2026 FC 1244 Court: Federal Court Decision date: 2026-10-08 (heard over five days, June and July 2026) Court file number: T-1887-17 Judge: McHaffie J. ...
Are Methods of Medical Treatment Patentable in Canada? What Pharmascience v. Janssen (2026 SCC 26) Means for Dosing Regimen Patents
Key takeaways In Pharmascience Inc. v. Janssen Inc., 2026 SCC 26 (July 17, 2026), the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously upheld Janssen’s Canadian Patent No. 2,655,335, which claims a dosing regimen for paliperidone palmitate (INVEGA SUSTENNA), an injectable antipsychotic given monthly to people with schizophrenia. Seven of the nine judges...
Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Flexibility in Section 45 Non‑Use Proceedings
Decision: Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne & Institut National De L’origine Et De La Qualité v. Coors Brewing Company, 2026 FCA 2 (Jan. 9, 2026) Court: Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) Overview On January 9, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) ruled that section 45 of the Trademarks Act does not impose a fixed rule requiring a trademark owner to justify...
Trademark Confusion in Healthcare: Why Patients Matter in the Analysis
Introduction When it comes to trademark disputes in the pharmaceutical industry, the question of who counts as the relevant consumer can make or break a case. A recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Novartis AG (2025 FCA 212) sheds light on this issue....
Bad Faith Trademark Filings: Lessons from the Tress Wellness Case
When you build a brand, protecting it with a trademark is essential. But what happens when someone else registers your brand name before you do? A recent Federal Court decision in FXSWEDE AB v. Gengbin Xu (2025 FC 1864) sheds light on this issue. The case highlights how Canadian law...
Common Design and Patent Infringement: Lessons from Adeia v Videotron
In a noteable decision released on November 14, 2025, the Federal Court of Canada addressed and applied for the first time in a decision the doctrine of common design in the context of patent infringement. The case, Adeia Guides Inc. v Videotron Ltd., 2025 FC 1725, offers valuable insights for...
When an Inventor Represents Himself in Court: Justice Whyte Nowak’s Decision in Dusome v Canada
In a recent Federal Court ruling, Barry Dusome and Wyatt Dusome v Attorney General of Canada, Justice Allyson Whyte Nowak set aside a decision by the Commissioner of Patents that had rejected a long-pending patent application for a new poker-style card game. The case is notable not just for its...
Visit our Videos page for short clips covering key patent and trademark topics and processes.